Methodology
The SGA team analyzed national and regional jobs data and economic patterns in order to evaluate the economic impacts associated with nuclear plants. The analysis employs a comprehensive approach, combining quantitative data with qualitative assessments. It incorporates various economic indicators, including employment rates, income levels, and regional economic growth trends. The methodology is grounded in established economic theories on regional input-output analysis.

Key findings
One of the central findings is the significant role nuclear plants play in local economies. These facilities are often among the largest employers in their regions, providing high-paying jobs that are crucial for community prosperity. Moreover, the presence of a nuclear plant tends to stimulate ancillary businesses and services, thereby amplifying economic activity in the area.

Nuclear plants are also significant contributors to community development. They often invest in local infrastructure, education, and community programs, which enhance the quality of life for residents. This aspect of corporate social responsibility is pivotal in fostering a positive relationship between the plant and its community.

Impact on employment
Local employment traditionally benefits from nuclear facilities; on the other hand, those economies are at risk should there be a nuclear facility closure. These facilities not only offer direct employment opportunities but also indirectly support jobs through supply chains and related industries. The high skill level required for many positions at nuclear plants also contributes to a more skilled and well-paid local workforce.

Employment multiplier effects
The analysis reveals that nuclear facilities exhibit substantial employment multiplier effects, indicating that for every job created within a nuclear facility, an additional 9.3 jobs are generated in the broader economy. This multiplier effect comprises both direct and indirect employment opportunities, encompassing not only the jobs within the plant but also those created in related sectors and industries due to the plant’s operations.

Direct, indirect, and induced job creation
A closer look at the data shows that for each job in a nuclear facility, the economy observes 515 additional indirect jobs created through suppliers and vendors. Furthermore, the spending from employment earnings leads to the creation of an additional 412 jobs, categorized as induced effects. This translates to an overall employment multiplier of approximately 9.27 jobs for every job at the facility.

It’s important to note that these effects are bilateral, meaning that the closure of a nuclear plant can have significant negative ripple effects on the local and regional economies​.

This quantitative analysis underscores the profound impact nuclear facilities have on employment and economic activity in their communities, highlighting their role as major economic drivers. The data also emphasizes the vulnerability of these communities to the closure of such facilities, given the extensive network of jobs and economic activities they support.

Income and economic growth
Another key aspect is the influence of nuclear plants on income levels and overall economic growth. The presence of these facilities is associated with higher average incomes in the region, likely a reflection of the well-paying jobs they provide. Furthermore, the study finds that these plants often act as catalysts for regional economic development, contributing to a more vibrant and diverse economic environment.