The Why and How of Measuring Access to Opportunity: A Guide to Performance Management

Authors

Publication Date

January 2017

Categories

Tags

Resource Type

Additional resources

A webinar was held on February 16, 2017 to review the content of the guidebook, discuss the changing state of practice in performance management, and answer questions. Watch the recorded webinar >>

The Why and How of Measuring Access to Opportunity: A Guide to Performance Management

Access to jobs, education, healthcare, and other essential services may be regarded as the primary purpose of transportation. Not surprisingly, transportation agencies across the country are increasingly interested in considering this as a key part of measuring system performance. Unfortunately, many transportation practitioners are not sure how to measure how well their system links people to their daily destinations and broader opportunity.

The Governors’ Institute on Community Design, a program of Smart Growth America, has created a resource on the data, tools, and methodologies transportation officials need to measure access to opportunity. The Why and How of Measuring Access to Opportunity: A Guide to Performance Management is written to help transportation agencies integrate measurements of “access to opportunity” into their planning and investment decisions.

The guidebook provides background on the changing priorities in transportation performance management, how some transportation agencies are already incorporating measures of access into their programs, and discusses the data and tools available to support measuring it. This resource might also be useful to elected and civic leaders, policy-makers, and stakeholders who wish to work with transportation agencies to address these important priorities.

The guidebook was informed by an Advisory Panel made up of Federal, state, and local practitioners, as well as two workshops on performance management and destination access.

This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under a cooperative agreement. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.